Ivy Leaf's Dairy 2021
Happy New Year
Happy New Year everybody. Let us be realistic, 2021 is going start out tougher than 2020 but there's light at the end of the tunnel. Keep on moving towards that light.
Unfortunately, for the first time in many years, we have no new calendar to hang on the wall. My husband, however, did a little bit of research and discovered that 2010 has the same dates as 2021 so our original calendar will have to suffice.
It reminds us of the hilarious sessions and photo-shoots that we have enjoyed with our army of amateur models and the lovely Victoria, Moira and in 2016, Cathie Jung.
2021 also has the same dates as 1965, the middle of that amazing decade that would change the world forever.
Let us indulge in a little piece of nostalgia as we show some pictures from the Golden age of corsetry.
Joan Sims laces a grunting Amelia Bayntun into a pair of corsets in 'Carry On Loving' (1970). Were women still wearing corsets then? Yes indeed. Regard the article below from 1969 published in the Spirella house magazine.
the complex (and expensive) wears a Spirelette 132 pantie-girdle. The bridegroom's mother wears a Coppelia 44 girdle. These were Spirella's off-the-shelf girdles. Would the bride's traditional mother have approved? Certainly the bride's elder sister, who must be in her 30s is wearing a corset but this is very old-fashioned for 1969. Perhaps the younger bride has fallen for the social revolution that has left her older sister unchanged. I suspect the corset might just be for 'special occasions' only, such as this wedding.
An exciting day for the bride and a proud moment for our consultant Mrs. H. of Peterborough. The bride wore Spirelettes 83 and 132 , the bridegroom's mother (on her left), a Coppelia 44 and Modern Line bra; sister of the bride (extreme right of picture) wore a 305 and Fashion Line bra, and (on the bride's right) her mother in a 325 corset and style 72 bra, and Mrs. H. in Spirella foundations 305 and 30. Reports Mrs. H.: "A guest at the wedding became interested in Spirella and ordered a Coppelia girdle and bra. Another guest had a Coppelia girdle and asked me to get her some support stockings." It was Mrs. H. who, in the August issue, explained how she had secured orders while helping out at a funeral. Is nowhere safe??
We really hope that 2021 will see the production of our final calendar for 2022. Let us look to the future with hope.
At some point in the past, we asked for help to identify the lady attending to the Queen Mother in these pictures. On the right they are at a Hardy Amies fashion show in December 1954.
One reader has tentatively suggested that the lady may be Lady Jean Margaret Florence Rankin (née Dalrymple; 1905 - 2001), 'woman of the bedchamber' to the Queen Mother from 1947 until 1994. Can anybody substantiate this? Circumstantial evidence is that Princess Margaret was present at the Hardy Amies show and was a close friend of Lady Jean. By a strange coincidence, Florence Dalrymple was the name of my husband's aunt who ran a draper's shop in Renfrew from which the Ivy Leaf Collection started.
The ever expanding book has now reached 269 pages, however, publication will have to wait for a return to being allowed to have guests in one's house again. At the end of last year, I hoped that this might be at Easter but I fear that is extremely optimistic. Our model Moira is only 42 and will not be vaccinated before she moves to Scotland and out of our reach later in the year - if she is allowed to that is.
Nevertheless, there are positives. Being of a certain age, I hope to be vaccinated in February and my husband, being one year younger, in March.
Meanwhile this piece of whimsy crossed our desks last week.
The un-pixelated version of the left-hand picture will appear in the book.
I feel that the Dummies are a bit modern for a book extolling 1960s corsetry.
Never mind '"Zip me up, Darling!"
Any poor women who was persuaded that she was 'Extra Stout' (my Goodness) would have to ask her husband
"Lace me up Darling; I hope you have a few hours to spare!"
Our current thoughts on the book are to publish it as is. With a little selective weeding out of unnecessary pages it now stands at 267 pages. The trouble is that every time we go through it to check for errors, it is highly tempting to add a bit more.
I have had my vaccination and I expect that my (slightly younger) husband will receive his soon.
The book is now with the publisher. There was the usual back and forth email flurry to sort out margins and all the technical minutiae that printers love and writers could hardly care less about. The book has ended up at 264 pages plus the cover and we await the first proof copy. Three pages had to be removed for copyright reasons but this hardly detracts from the content.
The draft book has arrived and it looks stunning but it is heavy, weighing in at 1.2 kg. Postage outside the UK will be expensive and to send it across the pond will be prohibitive. Nevertheless, we'll offer the books at cost price plus 10% (for charity) plus postal charges. The books should be printed in about three weeks and we will publish the costs before then. The book is an expanded version of the ring-bound 'What Lies Beneath' and is professionally bound. It looks amazing.
The Book: Prices and Postage
The book started out as a lockdown project to convert our first book 'What Lies Beneath' from Landscape into Portrait format.
During this process, we added 64 new pages and corrected a few errors. The book is very much derived from our web-site but using photographs of our models that never appear un-blurred on the web-site
We are only printing 10 copies of the book and because of this, the cost of production was £309.85 that works out at £30.99 per book. Postage to the UK is 3.30, to Europe £12.10 and to the USA (sorry guys) £29.20!!
The models in the book gave their time so that the calendars and books we have produced could be sold for charity, however, I am aware that the cost plus postage is very high particularly outside the UK. Also the pound has strengthened considerably over the past two months.
For that reason we will only add 10% to the cost of the book for charity. Should any purchaser wish to make an additional contribution to charity please feel free to do so. This can be added when you pay the PayPal invoice. So, the bottom line is
Total price including post and packing:
to the UK £37.19
to Europe £46.09
to the USA £63.19
We expect the book to be finally printed in a few weeks after which, we will immediately contact those who have expressed interest.
The books have arrived, all 10 of them and nine out of the 10 books were paid for almost immediately on receipt of invoice. In view of the interest, we have ordered some more books but not so many as to devalue their exclusivity.
|In September last year, I wrote about a film called
Drivers (1957) where an actress, Marjorie Rhodes (1897 - 1979)
appears in a substantial surgical corset. Miss Rhodes gained a
reputation for playing straight-talking (she was born in Yorkshire after
all), down-to-earth, formidable, well-built ladies, exactly the sort who
would wear corsets as she undoubtedly did.
An appropriate coincidence is that Miss Rhodes was born as Millicent Wise that
happens to be the name of a ladies shop in the Stoke-on-Trent area of England. In the late 1950s to
the 1970s, they sold corsets at Millicent Wise.
One of the beauties of compiling this web-site is that from time to time, we received fascinating insights into this period. This one comes from the nephew of the real Millicent Wise who ran the corset shop:
'Millicent Wise' was the name of a Corsetry, Lingerie and Swimwear retailer based in Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire. Originally the business was set up by an Emma Millicent Wise. Her brother Harry, encouraged by his older Sister expanded the business in the 50s. 60s and 70s. Milly continued with one single shop in Hanley, Stoke on Trent trading under the name Miss E.M Wise, City Corset Salon. Harry built his retail business up and at one time had shops in Crewe, Newcastle under Lyme, Tunstall, Hanley, Longton, Stafford, Wolverhampton, Walsall, Leek and Shrewsbury. The business dwindled over the years for a variety of reasons and eventually he was forced to sell his remaining shops to a company from Leicestershire, which was a manufacturer as well as corsetry retailer, Harwayes that was run by another Harry, Harry Wayte. Harwayes is still trading in lingerie. According to some, the shop 'Millicent Wise' was known as 'Militant Wives'!
The final copies of the book have arrived and invoices have been sent out to those who have expressed interest.
There is a lovely YouTube video by Jessica Kellgren-Fozard who suffers back pain caused by scoliosis. This pain was much relieved by wearing a made-to-measure corset from the company 'Fairy Gothmother'.
I have always maintained that the easiest corset to wear and tighten simply has to be a fan-lacer with a busk front and this is exactly what was custom made for Jessica. Ambrose Wilson's V80 corset used this arrangement as well and was popular despite the advertisement's scary description:
A belt for rigorous figure-discipline.
After 15 weeks of hard lockdown, non-essential shops can at last open in England. Pubs and restaurants can serve up to six people in a group but only outside until May 17th. Of course, it's snowing hard after a mild week and we have lunch booked for 1pm - outside of course and the temperature sits at 33oF!
To cheer ourselves up, we dug out the old 2012 calendar, the photo shoots for which were taken nearly 10 years ago. My husband found the running order for the shoot and a page from the book 'What Lies Beneath' shows the outcome. As my husband said at the time "Women do seem to love dressing up!"
If you look at the picture (right), you will notice that the running order did not go quite to plan since for the wedding shot, the plan was for all the models to be wearing M&S girdles. The photos with the dresses must have occurred earlier in the day since Marjorie has squeezed into a Spirelette 105 panty-girdle, Amy wears a Spirella girdle, Madeleine a Spirella 305 and Eileen, a Spirella 325. It looks like the photo was taken just before lunch. In some of the last photos (if you remember that calendar) the models hold glasses full of champagne and that was real champagne. These photo shoots were so much fun!
I remember now that the order of play was disrupted right at the start when Amy was late having been held up in a traffic jam. My husband who was organiser and photographer had to think on his feet and shuffle the schedule around Amy's initial absence, but it worked. Note that Marjorie required, according to the schedule, a corset to fit in the teal satin dress, however, she is obviously wearing a panty-girdle in the photograph.
What happened, and we have come across this before, is that when the fit is marginal, the bulk of the corset outweighs the attenuation and you are better off with a softer garment over which the zipper can be forced. Sure, the dress will not hang as well, but at least the zipper will close. This reminds me of a friend of my mother who was ordered by her doctor to be fitted with firm back support. To put a brave face on it she told my mother that she would lose at least one dress size. Sadly, this was not the case as the bulk of the rigidly boned garment added a dress size to the unfortunate woman.
These observations have prompted us to develop a new page called 'The Abominable Corset'.
We have come across a few curiosities from the 1960s that have been migrated to their proper places in the web-site: Visibility of Underwear and Stockings.
My husband and I have recently become what are referred to as 'Double Jabbers' as life slowly returns to some semblance of normality. Sadly, this is not the case in all countries at the moment. Meanwhile, a Spirella consultation that is not going to plan.
The Spirella 325 corset in the picture above right is fashioned in a beautiful orchid material (satin nylon). It was made-to-measure for Bunty (remember her) nearly 20 years ago. It has been modelled by a few of our older ladies that have put on weight over the years that we have been making the calendars.
Amazingly, Bunty has lost five stone, 70 pounds or 32 kilos since those days and the corset is too big on her. For the photograph below taken in 2016 all the lacing was done up tight whereas there used to be a couple of inches gap both front and back. What fun we had then in 2016 when Cathie Jung visited us and joined in the calendar. In the right hand photograph, Marjorie, Bunty and Cathie all wear Axfords reproduction Victorian corsets but of dramatically different sizes. Cathie's 21-inch corset was, of course, far too big for her.
Recalling some stories about the boning of corsets and the contrast between the soft, elegant exterior and the hard uncompromising interior as related in Tales:
My corsetiere tells me
of several clients, whose first act of the day is to don their corsets, and
their last act before retiring to take them off again. An old family friend was
such a person. This lady was outstanding in her appearance. Although in her 70s,
she possessed a slim and elegant figure. Her clothes were her extravagance,
old-fashioned, yet tasteful and expensive confections of patterned chiffons and
silks. Her hair was like a spun silver web and her stocking seams ruler straight
down to her court shoes. Only the complete rigidity of her torso indicated that
she was corseted from shoulders to thigh. She made no secret of the fact, and
would jokingly say to younger women how Spencer had looked after her figure
tapping her unyielding stomach. Her corsets, as one might suppose, were, within
the constraints of their functionality, as beautifully, yet conservatively cut
as her clothes. The sturdy buckles, straps and bones, almost enhanced the
appearance of her stays rather than detracting from it. Presumably these
creations were thrown away after she died, as has been the fate of so many
A wispy old lady in floating chiffons and delicate lace, her hair shone like the spun silk of her favourite dresses. It seemed as though this ephemeral piece of thistledown would blow away in the breeze. It came, therefore as a shock to my husband, the first time he helped her into her chair. Aware as most men are of the softness of the female form, he was struck by the incongruous rigidity and hardness of her frame. I had already seen her corsets on a previous visit and knew what was coming. The poor old dear was anchored to ‘terra firma’ by no less than three pounds of Spencer’s firmest surgical corsets.
My aunt was very proud of her erect
posture and frequently admonished the younger generation for their
dreadful slouching. We all knew that if the younger generation wore
corsets like hers, they would have perfect posture as well, but we were
far too polite to mention it. That is until one day when she fired off a
tirade culminating with “.. look at my ramrod posture.” My son (who
would have been about eight at the time) piped up, “That’s because
you’ve got ramrods down your back!” “Pardon me, young man. What do
you mean by that?” “Every time you bend over I can see two great rods
up your back.” I scolded him and told him not to make personal remarks.
I explained to my aunt that, indeed, the bones in her corset were quite
visible when she bent over. She was mortified that people knew her secret!
I was a very cute looking boy when I was about 11 or 12 years old,
certainly I was the recipient of a disproportionate amount of matronly
cuddles, or bear-hugs as I called them. I was fascinated, however, by
one elderly relative who looked so fragile that a gust of wind might
well have knocked her over, yet her cuddles were painful and hard.
Moreover she seemed to have two rods down her back. I asked my mother
about this and she mumbled that they must have been bones. I looked
perplexed and she added "Bones, you know, bones in her corsets." I then
received a lecture on structured foundation garments that left my mother
rather red-faced. "Do you wear corsets" I asked. "NO I DO NOT!" she
retorted. I had no idea why she was so blunt but she softened and added
"I wear what's called a girdle; it has bones to give it shape but not
the rigid steels of a corset." So now I knew.
My aunt was very proud of her erect posture and frequently admonished the younger generation for their dreadful slouching. We all knew that if the younger generation wore corsets like hers, they would have perfect posture as well, but we were far too polite to mention it. That is until one day when she fired off a tirade culminating with “.. look at my ramrod posture.” My son (who would have been about eight at the time) piped up, “That’s because you’ve got ramrods down your back!” “Pardon me, young man. What do you mean by that?” “Every time you bend over I can see two great rods up your back.” I scolded him and told him not to make personal remarks. I explained to my aunt that, indeed, the bones in her corset were quite visible when she bent over. She was mortified that people knew her secret!
I think I was a very cute looking boy when I was about 11 or 12 years old, certainly I was the recipient of a disproportionate amount of matronly cuddles, or bear-hugs as I called them. I was fascinated, however, by one elderly relative who looked so fragile that a gust of wind might well have knocked her over, yet her cuddles were painful and hard. Moreover she seemed to have two rods down her back. I asked my mother about this and she mumbled that they must have been bones. I looked perplexed and she added "Bones, you know, bones in her corsets." I then received a lecture on structured foundation garments that left my mother rather red-faced. "Do you wear corsets" I asked. "NO I DO NOT!" she retorted. I had no idea why she was so blunt but she softened and added "I wear what's called a girdle; it has bones to give it shape but not the rigid steels of a corset." So now I knew.
Doreen (Spirella 325) and Madeleine (a very rare satin Camp) display the engineering that lies beneath the soft silks and satins of their wedding outfits, whilst Marjorie is strapped into a vintage Jenyns dorsal lumbar support with four surgical steels flanking her poor spine.
Wearing the same corset, Victoria reveals the perils of leaning forward.
We have a section devoted to this topic, however, we received a fascinating letter just the other day:
Nothing shows through white like white!
A white bra WILL show through a white top!
Nothing you can do!
Under white, any colour BUT white or black.
Black CAN work under the brighter reds or purples
CAMP and Dogs
What is it about CAMP corset advertising and dogs? We captioned the left-hand picture years ago as "You dare to photograph me in my corsets, and I'll throw my dog at you !" Some decades later, the dog loving advertisers have struck again. "Do you need extra figure support?" they ask. Quite possibly if one was going to hoist quite a heavy poodle to such heights without serious injury.
Dog or no dog, I have said it before and I'll say it again, there's nothing quite like a CAMP to flatten that abdomen with a few simple pulls on those straps. Just beware of the engineering showing through light-weight fabrics.
We have lamented this feature elsewhere. Why is it that a girdle, and the Berlei on the left is a classic example, have such pretty fronts and such plain, dull and boring backs? It is a common feature and we commented on it in our French pages. Is it simply that the view in the mirror will look pleasing and the manufacturer can save money on the rear? According to my husband, the rear view of a down-stretch satin panel at the back of a girdle is worth the expense but he's an engineer, not a manufacturing accountant. One thing is for certain, the rear bones on the that Berlei are going to show through all but the thickest of fabrics!
Even the lovely 1950s Galaxy on the right has a gorgeous satin front panel, but once again, the rear is a poor relation although some effort has gone into the patterned fabric.
A very pretty garment. What a shame that the suspenders have been cut off.
Here we have yet another example of 'boring back syndrome' courtesy of the Italian company Vestal.
There is however, one very interesting feature that can be seen below where the corset has been turned inside out. For indeed, this is a corset and not because of the lacing. Our explanation of the difference between a corset and a girdle explains that a corset must be non-expandable at some point in its construction and the clever Italians have inserted an internal ribbon at the waist thereby turning what could have been a girdle into an effective corset.
Can an experienced corsetiere tell if a woman is wearing a corset or a girdle? Indeed, she can as we have related in 'The March of the Wombles'.
I cannot believe that it is August already. We had a phone call from Cathie Jung yesterday; always a pleasure to hear from her and Bob. It reminded us of their visit to the UK in 2016. We refer to this in our book 'I'm Killing my Girdle'.
11th August 2020: Happy 19th Birthday Ivy Leaf
Nineteen years ago, my husband and I started to assemble the Ivy Leaf web-site and we are still at it. Can we get to 20 years? Who knows, the world is not the place it was half a year ago but we live in hope.
Over the last wee, we have left you with some views that were common in the 50s and 60s but are hardly ever seen today and a mystery to a whole generation. These images have now been moved here and can be accessed by clicking on the pictures below:
Well, that is the end of a week of celebrating Ivy Leaf's 19th birthday.
It is always a pleasure to be in contact with the models who have posed in the past for our calendars and that have featured in the diary for the past week. We had a viewer who asked about the tea-rose girdle featured on the 18th August. As it happened, we enjoyed lunch with that particular model, Amy, yesterday (18th Aug). Now 10 years older than when the picture was taken, she is still a very glamorous grandmother.
We mentioned in May 2021 about the contrast in a woman's appearance and the reality of what structure lies beneath the silks and satins: "A wispy old lady in floating chiffons and delicate lace, her hair shone like the spun silk of her favourite dresses. It seemed as though this ephemeral piece of thistledown would blow away in the breeze. It came, therefore as a shock to my husband, the first time he helped her into her chair. Aware as most men are of the softness of the female form, he was struck by the incongruous rigidity and hardness of her frame. I had already seen her corsets on a previous visit and knew what was coming. The poor old dear was anchored to ‘terra firma’ by no less than three pounds of Spencer’s firmest surgical corsets." This is never more apparent when you consider the structure of some stunningly elegant gowns of the 1940s - 1970s.
It seems that Ivy Leaf's 19th birthday provoked some readers to lament that several models did not feature: Bunty, Cathie and Patricia from Brabarella. How remiss of us; we have made an addition to the 19 years page.
For those of you who are fans of the late Lyn Locke, we have come across more photographs of her. They are located in the 'hidden' areas of the web-site.
People have asked "What are these hidden areas?" Not often, but sometimes a picture will contain a clickable link that takes you to these areas. You might start with 'Garters & Lace'. We would be most interested to know the name of the lady with Lyn. [Thanks very much to the reader who alerted us to
newsletter of September 2005 where the lady in question is interviewed as Angela. Was that her real name I wonder? Probably about as much as Lyn Locke was a real name.]
Back to the 19th birthday image collages. A reader suggested that the ladies on the 15th and 16th in the gold satin suit were both Victoria, however, it was indeed Moira on the 15th wearing the same suit (five years later) but not the same underwear as the glimpses reveal. Victoria (right) wears an American Custom Maid panty-girdle with a lacy hem, Moira (far right) wears the formidable Spirelette 105 with the plain satin elastic panel at the hem. It is very easy to think that they are the same woman from the angle of the photographs but note that Victoria sports an engagement ring and Moira does not. We love it when readers write to us with comments.
Good Gracious, another month passes. We have spent some time researching the 'Garters & Lace' conventions organised by Lyn Locke and her partner Mike. These were well documented in their monthly newsletter called 'The Power Net' (see above). Sadly, all the models involved seemed to have faded into obscurity or perhaps they are still active in a field that we have not discovered. Any recollections and memories of these events would be greatly appreciated.
Regard the images on the left taken in 1960 on a British ocean liner. The women are attending the captain's cocktail party. Notice the very 1960s details: The lady holding a cigarette, the lady smiling to show the uncorrected gaps in her teeth. Mind you, more than half of her peers would be wearing full dentures so she has actually lasted rather well.
The middle picture shows the transition from the flared skirts and petticoats of the 1950s to the pencil skirt of the 1960s. Note the length of the hem; the mini-skirt was still several years in the future. So, what would lie beneath the gowns of these 1960s 50-something lovelies? The panty-girdle had not really become established in Britain so it is most likely that a girdle would be worn beneath the sheath dress. As for the flared skirt, no controlling lower foundation would be needed although in 1960, a fifty-something would feel undressed without one. Had the gown been strapless, then Liz Fraser's outfit in the film "Carry On Cruising" (1962) would certainly pass muster.
Back to the 'hidden areas'. Not often, but sometimes a picture will contain a clickable link that takes you to these areas. You might start with 'Garters & Lace' or look at the words in 'The Other Side of Corsetry'.
Summer is nearly over, officially it ends with the beginning of Autumn (Fall) on the autumnal equinox that this year lies on 22nd September. Whilst our Antipodean friends look forward to another scorching summer, us northerners prepare for dropping temperatures and the approach of winter. My husband is quite cheerful about this being a keen amateur astronomer (as was the husband of Ethel Granger). The dark nights will see him outside with his telescopes and camera, the latter of which has seen more heavenly bodies than most cameras ever will.
The change of seasons marks our progression through the year and allowed a good corsetière to persuade her clients that their corset wardrobe should match the seasons as well. I commented on this some time ago when a cousin (once removed) recounted just how many corsets her old granny possessed after she passed away. Her dressing room drawers contained over 20 identically sized, identically coloured, white Spencer corsets. This was quite an investment representing about US $4,000 at today’s values. The only differences were in the weight of the material. There were some in a very lightweight ‘aertex’ style, some in the good old Orchid material (artificial and washable satin) and a few in a heavy brocade. The lady was wealthy and travelled extensively. I can only presume that she took along a collection of corsets (they are not the easiest garments to wash and dry on holiday) appropriate to the climate of her destination, hence the large collection. Now that is the sort of client that most corsetières can only dream about.
We watched the 1952 film 'The Importance of being Earnest' just the other day and were entranced, not just by the husky voice of Joan Greenwood (1921 - 1987), but by her spectacular waist. Sometimes you wonder whether she is heroically corsetted or is she naturally very thin. Well, in this case there is no doubt since the busk studs on her corsets are clearly seen embossed against the fabric of her dress. She is accompanied by Edith Evans (1888 - 1976) who would, of course, have been brought up wearing corsets. My engineering husband immediately set about calculating exactly what waist size Miss Greenwood possessed based on her height (variously estimated between 5' 0" and 5' 1"). It works out at 21 - 22", very small indeed, but by 1952s standards it probably only required a 2 - 3" reduction from her natural 31-year-old waist. On the other hand, the far taller (5' 7") 64-year-old Edith Evans sports a 33" waist although it looks smaller due to the flambuoyant dress design, even so she probably required a few inches reduction as well, something to which she would be well accustomed.
Edith Evans and Joan Greenwood Joan Greenwood with a superimposed corset to show the busk stud positions (actually modelled by Victoria)
Happy Birthday Madeleine
Madeleine's derriere, suitably encased in a sumptuous satin CAMP corset graced our first ever calendar shot in 2009. Her colleague, Eileen, wore the Jenyns on the right.
Yesterday was Madeleine's birthday and she let it be known that it was a 'significant' one. One has to be careful here. We knew she was over 70 but did not want to make the unforgiveable gaff of suggesting she might be 80 when in fact she was only 75.
We were astonished when she told us that yesterday, she turned 90!! Madeleine has appeared in seven out of our nine calendars and in five photo-shoots, all of which she enjoyed immensely. The poor, long-suffering Madeleine was laced, strapped and buckled into all sorts of garments and on one memorable occasion, my husband was called into the dressing room to help her close the hooks-and-eyes on her Marks and Spencer girdle so that the zipper could be fastened.
Madeleine got into the CAMP in 2009 (Calendar cover), in 2011 (left - with Jenny and Marjorie), in 2015 (middle - with Marjorie and Victoria) and on the right once more in the CAMP with buckles, laces and satin in abundance. What fun we had!
Earlier this year, we asked if anybody could identify this lady who accompanied the Queen Mother and Princess Margaret to functions in the early 1960s.
A reader has suggested that the lady may be Dame Margaret Katherine Hay (nee Seymour 1918 - 1975) who was succeeded by Lady Susan Hussey in 1960 as the Queen Mother's Lady-in-waiting. There are precious few photographs of her, however, a picture in her youth reveals a good likeness.
Regarding the Queen Mother, here is a comment from the Spirella Magazine of July 1960:
A client of Mrs. C of Birmingham, was recently presented to the Queen Mother. "I was wearing a 515 corset and a 384 brassiere and felt as confident and as well corsetted as the Queen Mother herself," remarked the client.